Near the end of Steyn's excellent weekend column there is a line, a brilliant observation (amongst a sea of brilliant observations) on the state of western society.
Best not to take any chances. That's another way societies seize up – by obsessing on phantom threats rather than real ones.
Though the column is on the faltering world economy, taken out of context, these lines could very well apply to nearly all of the cultural neuroses that plague my country. Aside from the obvious "global warming is a greater threat than global jihad" nonsense, there are myriad bogeymen prowling the edges of American imaginations.
The Independent and the
Times online each have an article chronicling the scientific illiteracy of many of our most prominent public figures, including both of America's recent presidential candidates.
To its credit,
the Independent takes on the frightfully widespread belief that preservatives in children's vaccines can cause autism.
"We've seen just a skyrocketing autism rate," said President-elect Obama. "Some people are suspicious that it's connected to the vaccines. This person included. The science right now is inconclusive, but we have to research it," he said. His words were echoed by Mr McCain. "It's indisputable that [autism] is on the rise among children, the question is what's causing it," he said. "There's strong evidence that indicates it's got to do with a preservative in the vaccines."
Exhaustive research has failed to substantiate any link to vaccines or any preservatives. The rise in autism is thought to be due to an increased awareness of the condition.
The Times echoes this in its column. I see so much of it in southern California, even among women I believe to be on the higher end of the intelligence scale. I used to work out with a paediatrician who lamented the rise of "Jenny McCarthy science." "I see this all of the time with the parents of autistic kids; they need someone to blame, so they blame the vaccinations. And you get some bimbo who goes on Oprah claiming that her son's autism was caused by vaccines and then the movement gains national attention, which legitimises it. And then I get to deal with kids becoming gravely ill and dying from easily preventable diseases, things we haven't seen in forty, fifty years. It's irresponsible." Even if the science did support it, the benefits of not losing one's child to whooping cough outweigh the minuscule risks.
So while there is a real war going on, a war waged on the west by backward religious radicals whose aim is to throw civilization back a thousand years or so and restore the global caliphate, we are worrying about junk science and
faux food allergies. [H/t:
Kathy Shaidle.]
[An off-topic aside: Why is my browser's spellcheck dictionary
still speaking to me in British English?]